The UN IPCC is a political body driven by ideology
A press release from a drug company, say one that sells “VitaLife” that stated,“90% of doctors prescribe VitaLife” would be unlikely to elicit headlines in the national press the next day exhorting everyone to start taking it. And if you saw such a headline you would instantly presume that it was a paid advertisement and not the final word on curing disease.
When one sees reports that have been sourced from The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) one presumes that as an intergovernmental body of the United Nations that it is more authoritative than a company.
The hallmark of all successful organizations is that employees believe in their mission. The IPCC is no different. Their objective is to understand “the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change,” which is a mission that was set by the United Nations.
The IPCC has attracted a generation of scientists and supporters who have seen the movie, An Inconvenient Truth and are concerned about the environment. The movie was likely shown to them by their science teacher who presented it as settled science. For them it is an indisputable fact that human-generated carbon dioxide is causing the climate to change for the worse.
The IPCC along with their government funders created the discipline of “climate science.” Prior to the 1990s the study of climate was handled by a variety of specialists including climatologists, meteorologists, astrophysicists and oceanographers.
The “climate scientists” that follow the IPCC’s mission focus exclusively on proving that human-generated carbon dioxide is causing the climate to change and they have been successful in finding correlations that supports the belief. They review each others papers and control funding. They are the doctor, the drug company and the regulatory authority rolled into one. Every ache, pain and infection they see is proof their treatment is justified and effective.
Their pronouncements are blasted out to the world at the periodic Conference of Parties (COP) meetings, the locations of which are incorporated into our political vernacular: Paris, Kyoto, Bonn, Copenhagen and Madrid.
The IPCC along with the overtly political arm the UN FCCC, plus Al Gore’s army of highly motivated “Climate Reality Leaders,” have aggressively promoted their “climate science” and discredited and de-platformed those who do not believe in their elixir.
The IPCC has a mission to prove that the climate is changing because of human-generated carbon dioxide. They are like a doctor, drug company and regulatory authority rolled into one. Their elixir is bad for Canada’s health.
The IPCC has attracted those on a mission
In 2011 Donna Laframboise the investigative journalist from Ontario published the book, The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert. It documents how the public image of the IPCC is different to the reality. As usual in this climate change saga the book did not get an airing in the mainstream press.
How "climate change" came to mean "human-caused"
The Earth’s climate has always changed, that is certain. But how did “climate change” come to mean that humans are to blame for bad weather? Here is a long, thoughtfully penned article that explains the details, written by Dr. Ronan Connolly.
The Connolly father and son team are independent scientists based in Ireland. For more information on their groundbreaking climate research, including links to their published peer-reviewed articles, see ronanconnollyscience.com/